Published in Wallpaper* November 2008
New Yorkers
love to practice the destruction of their city. The Will Smith-fights-vampires
movie I Am Legend showed, again and
again, a desolate Times Square, lions ripping up deer flesh while grasses
whispered in a space currently alive with five-abreast tourists gawking at Sex
& the City ads. J J Abrams’ Cloverfield imagined a monster ripping through the city with the
force of a thousand furies. And the War of the Worlds had Tom Cruise just across the river, watching
cracks in the streets open up for attacking aliens. It’s a post-9/11 condition,
this desire to rehearse, prepare for and control our destruction before it
happens. At the same time, we’ve become obsessed with the Greenmarket, with
eating locally, seasonally, with sustainable futures, with trying to be as
close to a Michael Pollan version – “Eat food. Not too much. Mostly plants.” --
of an omnivore as we can. It seems like two completely separate channels, but
three art events this summer only showed that our love for nature and our
obsession with the apocalypse are, in fact, closely entwined.
After Nature is a brilliant show put on by the New Museum,
suddenly a big hitter since the opening of their SANAA-designed building last
December. Organized by Massimiliano Gioni and curatorial assistant Jarrett
Gregory, After Nature uses a
Werner Herzog film and a W.G. Sebald essay as starting-off points for a series
of pieces that explore how the world might be, once nature is something we
remember rather than look forward to. The works span aesthetics and media,
sharing only polemic drive. A tree sawed apart and put back together with
massive brackets and screws by the artist Zoe Leonard makes you realize the
inanity of the idea that nature needs our help to survive, while a piece by
Tino Sehgal in which a series of dancers writhe on the floor -- changing every
two hours with a few minutes of synced-up overlap – is, through its
face-to-face (or body-to-body) communication, about the translatability of oral
history. It implies that, one day not so far away, person-to-person contact
might be the only technology we’ve got.